2. A “snapshot” comparison of the upcoming frameworks
a) Legislative Framework
UK: The FCA’s AML/CTF regime has been applicable to VASPs since January 2020.
With respect to the proposed regulatory framework:
- Phase 1: The issuance and custody of fiat-backed stablecoins will be regulated under the FSMA 2000 regime, while the use of such stablecoins as a means of payment will be regulated via amendments to existing payments legislation (i.e. Payment Services Regulations 2017).
- Phase 2: The intention is to include the financial services regulation of certain cryptoasset activities within the regulatory framework established by FSMA 2000, rather than develop a standalone bespoke regime.
- Future phases: TBD.
EU: The current patchwork-landscape of AML/CTF regimes applicable to VASPs due to local law implementations of the EU's 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (EU) 2018/843
MiCA introduces an EU-level regulatory framework covering a range of cryptoasset activities which fall outside of existing financial services legislation. It is set to apply from 30 December 2024 (with provisions relating to stablecoins applying from 30 June 2024).
b) Definition of cryptoassets
UK: FSMA 2023 defines cryptoassets as “any cryptographically secured digital representation of value or contractual rights that – (a) can be transferred, stored or traded electronically, and (b) that uses technology supporting the recording or storage of data (which may include distributed ledger technology).”
EU: MiCA defines cryptoassets as “a digital representation of value or rights which may be transferred and stored electronically, using distributed ledger technology or similar technology.”
c) Scope of regime
UK: The list of activities to be regulated under Phase 1 includes:
- Issuance of fiat-backed stablecoins
- Custody of fiat-backed stablecoins
Separately, payment service providers which use fiat-backed stablecoins in payment chains may need new permissions under the PSRs 2017.
The indicative list of activities to be regulated under Phase 2 includes:
- Admitting a cryptoasset to a cryptoasset trading venue
- Making a public offer of a cryptoasset
- Operating a cryptoasset trading venue
- Dealing in cryptoassets as principal or agent
- Arranging (bringing about) deals in cryptoassets
- Making arrangements with a view to transactions in cryptoassets
- Operating a cryptoasset lending platform
- Safeguarding and/or administering (or arranging the same) a cryptoasset other than a fiat-backed stablecoin (i.e. custody)
EU: MiCA covers:
- issuance of stablecoins
- custody and administration of cryptoassets
- operation of a trading platform for cryptoassets
- exchange of cryptoassets for funds
- exchange of cryptoassets for other cryptoassets
- execution of orders for cryptoassets
- placing of cryptoassets
- reception and transmission of orders for cryptoassets
- providing advice on cryptoassets
- providing portfolio management on cryptoassets
- providing transfer services for cryptoassets
Unlike the UK approach, MiCA deliberately does not cover lending and borrowing of cryptoassets (Recital 94). However, MiCA does impose an obligation on the European Commission to present a report on cryptoasset developments by 30 December 2024, and such report must contain (among other things) an assessment of the necessity and feasibility of regulating lending and borrowing of cryptoassets.
d) Authorizations required
UK: Cryptoasset exchange providers and custodian wallet providers must register with the FCA under the AML/CTF regime as a VASP. In future, entities carrying out cryptoasset activities by way of business falling within Phase 1 or Phase 2 would need to be authorised by the FCA under Part 4A of FSMA 2000.
EU: Pursuant to 5AMLD, cryptoasset service providers falling within scope of national AML/CTF regimes will need to register with the relevant authority. In future, under MiCA, cryptoasset entities carrying out activities falling within scope of MiCA will need to obtain permissions under MiCA to issue stablecoins, or the relevant authorizations as a cryptoasset service provider.
e) Transition process
UK: VASPs already registered with the FCA under its anti-money-laundering regime will not be automatically granted authorizations under the new regime, as the new regime will cover aspects of regulatory compliance that may not have previously been assessed. However, the FCA will consider the regulatory histories of all firms applying for authorisation under the new regime. Other firms that have an existing authorizations under Part 4A of FSMA (for example, those authorised to operate a Multilateral Trading Facility) will need to apply for a Variation of Permission in order to undertake newly regulated cryptoasset activities
EU: The transition processes will depend on the approach to be taken by individual Member States.
f) Geographic coverage
UK: Phase 1 will cover the activities of issuance and custody of fiat-backed stablecoins where the coin is issued in or from the UK. Stablecoins issued overseas may need to be subject to approvals by payment arrangers authorised by the FCA. Phase 2 will cover cryptoasset activities provided in or to the United Kingdom (i.e. including the activities of overseas firms).
EU: MiCA will apply to all persons that offer cryptoassets or provide cryptoasset services to EU residents, regardless of their geographical location. However, there may be an exemption under Article 61(1) where an EU customer approaches a cryptoasset service provider by their own initiative (i.e. the “reverse solicitation” principle).
g) Treatment of Non-fungible Tokens (NFTs)
UK: NFTs generally are not expected to fall within scope of the future financial services regulatory regime. However, such NFTs will need to be assessed on a case by case basis – for example, an NFT would be in scope if it was in practice used as a financial services instrument
EU: MiCA states that it shall not apply to cryptoassets that are unique and not fungible with other cryptoassets – accordingly, NFTs should not fall within scope of MiCA (Recitals 10-11). MiCA further clarifies that whether an NFT will fall within the regulatory perimeter of MiCA will depend on how the NFT is used in practice rather than how it is designed or marketed. Additionally, fractional shares of a single, non-fungible cryptoasset are also not considered to be an NFT.
MiCA also imposes an obligation on the European Commission to present a report on cryptoasset developments by 30 December 2024, and such report must contain (among other things) an assessment of market developments in NFTs and of the appropriate regulatory treatment of NFTs.
h) Approach to Decentralized Finance (DeFi)
UK: The UK government does not intend to ban DeFi. However, HM Treasury considers that it would be premature and ineffective for the UK to introduce a UK regulatory framework at this stage. Instead, the UK will support efforts at the international level through work at both the FSB and standard setting bodies.
EU: MiCA does not set out a regulatory framework covering DeFi. However, MiCA imposes an obligation on the European Commission to present a report on cryptoasset developments by 30 December 2024, and such report must contain (among other things) an assessment of DeFi, including an assessment of the necessity and feasibility of regulating DeFi.
i) Approach to Staking
UK: HM Treasury has provided some additional clarity on the definition and potential future treatment of staking in its Consultation Response, and has confirmed that it will accelerate its exploratory work which involves extensive engagement with stakeholders. In particular, the aim is to: (i) develop a clear definition of staking, (ii) establishing a taxonomy of different staking business models currently in the market, and (iii) identifying how to mitigate associated risks.
EU: MiCA does not expressly address staking. Staking may be covered in the future under a “MiCA 2.0”.