What we do
Our thinking
The ESG Litigation Guide provides detailed analysis of chosen European and international ESG litigation cases, both decided and pending. It includes details on the claims raised by the parties, the relevant legislation, public statements by interested parties, as well as links to judgements and press reports.
Share this content:
Mexico has experienced a growing wave of ESG-related litigation in recent years, reflecting an evolving regulatory framework, heightened market expectations, and an increased role of strategic lawsuits. The country is progressively becoming a focal point for ESG disputes, particularly in environmental and corporate governance matters.
The key drivers of ESG litigation in Mexico include non-governmental organizations (NGOs), activist groups, and affected communities challenging corporate practices, particularly in sectors such as energy, mining, and manufacturing. Climate-related litigation is gaining momentum, with lawsuits aiming to enforce emission reduction commitments established under the General Law on Climate Change and international agreements like the Escazú Agreement. In addition, cases of strategic litigation against corporate greenwashing are emerging, seeking to hold companies accountable for misleading sustainability claims.
Sector-specific litigation trends reveal significant challenge for businesses. The energy and natural resources industries face an increasing number of environmental lawsuits, particularly related to extractive activities and their social impact. The automotive and manufacturing sectors are subject to rising legal claims linked to supply chain compliance, carbon footprint transparency, and adherence to ESG reporting standards under the Securities Market Law amendment and the Sustainability Information Standards (NIS). Meanwhile, financial institutions must navigate legal challenges linked to transparency in sustainable investments and compliance with ESG risk assessment obligations.
Mexico’s regulatory landscape is evolving, creating both compliance challenges and litigation risks. The Sustainable Taxonomy, designed to classify sustainable investments, is expected to be a key reference in legal disputes over green financing. Additionally, corporate due diligence obligations in supply chains are becoming a focal point of emerging litigation, with claims emphasizing human rights concerns, forced labor prevention, and responsible sourcing.
Looking ahead, companies operating in Mexico must stay informed about ongoing ESG litigation trends and case law developments. Strategic litigation in areas such as environmental responsibility, shareholder activism, and corporate accountability is likely to continue shaping the regulatory and business landscape. In this context, businesses must proactively implement ESG compliance strategies to mitigate legal risks and align with best practices in responsible corporate governance.